Comparison: Traditional VPN vs. SD-WAN
Although both technologies connect sites, SD-WAN offers more advanced capabilities for demanding environments. The choice depends on each company's specific needs.
Comparison: Traditional VPN vs. SD-WAN| Feature | Traditional Site-to-Site VPN | SD-WAN |
|---|
| Link Management | Typically one active link at a time (active/passive). | Simultaneous use of multiple links (active/active). |
|---|
| Failover | Manual or with longer switchover times. | Automatic and instantaneous, with no session interruption. |
|---|
| Traffic Optimisation | Based on static routes or simple routing protocols. | Dynamic and application-aware (prioritises voice, video, ERP). |
|---|
| Management & Visibility | Decentralised, requires device-by-device configuration. | Centralised from a single pane of glass with full visibility. |
|---|
| Cost | Generally more cost-effective for simple scenarios. | Higher initial investment, but optimises the cost and use of links. |
|---|